The Constitutional Court ruled that prolonged divorce cases violate the right to marry. This decision could be a significant step towards expediting divorce processes.

N.Ç. and other applicants stated that they were deprived of their right to remarry and establish a family due to the prolonged divorce proceedings. AYM evaluated this situation and made an important decision.

AYM emphasized that the right to marry is guaranteed under Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In this context, it highlighted the necessity for divorce cases to be concluded within a reasonable time frame.

The decision is seen as a significant development in expediting divorce processes and protecting individuals' rights to marry. AYM also ruled for the payment of moral compensation.

It was stated that prolonged divorce cases negatively affect individuals' lives and imply that the state has failed to fulfill its obligations.