Artificial intelligence learns from data, but we approve without thinking. Everyone is busy with data, but no one is discussing it. Being analytical is not thinking; rather, it sometimes postpones thinking.

Data is not a nas. It is not even a thesis. It is the creator of the thesis, serving the antithesis and directing to the synthesis. The system learns, graphs shine, tables are updated. But no one is talking about what those tables say or don’t say.

Because the voice of data is loud, but the voice of humans is quiet. What silences the human voice is the stance of 'submission' in the face of power. Data can be powerful, AI can be powerful, but it should never submit.

Because data is being sanctified. Every number is presented as an 'unalterable truth'. Objecting to data is not thoughtlessness; it is the essence of thinking.

If you tie anything to the sacred, you close it off, hold it from discussion, and lead it to rot. The shawl of sanctity has always covered the truth.