The landmark ruling from the Supreme Court highlights a significant development in divorce cases. In Muğla, a man recorded a video suspecting his wife's infidelity.

The court initially sentenced him to 2 years and 1 month in prison for violating privacy. However, the Supreme Court overturned this decision, granting him acquittal.

The Supreme Court ruled that the images taken in a public space did not constitute a violation of privacy. This has sparked a new debate on evidence collection methods in divorce cases.