The Ankara 3rd Civil Court of First Instance made an important decision in the absolute nullity case. The court stated that the necessary conditions for invalidating the election results were not met.

The court emphasized that no concrete documents were presented to invalidate the congress and provincial congress. It highlighted that such claims cannot be proven solely by witness statements.

The court also addressed the claims that benefits were provided to delegates, which could lead to personal responsibility under criminal law, but would not legally invalidate the elections.

Ultimately, the court stated that absolute nullity can only be proven with documents and legal grounds, and witness statements do not hold evidentiary value in this regard.

This decision emphasized that discussions regarding political ethics and intra-party moral values cannot be subject to judicial decisions.